McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All ER 1008 Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. McGhee v National Coal Board (1973) 1 WLR 1 This case considered the issue of causation and whether or not the failure of an employer to provide adequate washing facilities caused or materially contributed to a worker contracting dermatitis. Lord Salmon. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 (HL) NOTE: You must connect to Westlaw Next before accessing this resource. At first instance the Court found the defendant, Essex Area Health Authority, liable for the infant’s injuries, citing McGhee v National Coal Board 1 WLR 1 as laying down the precedent that where there existed a plurality of possible causes, the burden fell to the defendant to prove that their actions had not been the but for or material cause of the injury. Preview text Download Save. Tort Law Causation Essay. Continue Reading. Case: Edwards v. National Coal Board (1949) Precendent: Reasonably Practicable In this case, a miner (Edwards) was killed when a section of the road on which he was travelling subsided. The Claimant worked in the Defendant’s brick works, a hot and dusty environment. 1008, 1 W.L.R. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. About us; Jobs; Blog; Dutch Website … McGhee Cases & Articles Tagged Under: McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] UKHL 7 | Page 1 of 1 Causation: The sum of the parts St John's Chambers (Chambers of Susan Hunter) | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2016 #148 When a defendant has been proved to have negligently contributed to the development of an injury, should they be liable if it can be shown that the plaintiff’s actions also led to the development, and the exact cause is unknown? 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. Edwards v National Coal Board [1949] All ER 743 (CA) Reasonably practicable – definition, the quantum of risk test. In Thomas and others v National Coal Board and Barker v National Coal Board (15.5.87) EOR14E, the EAT upholds an industrial tribunal finding that the risk and additional responsibility of unsupervised night work as a canteen assistant justified unequal pay with day work both because they amounted to differences of practical … United Kingdom The cause of the dermatitis was put down to two possible causes, either the dust he was exposed to during his working hours, which was not a breach of duty, or the … TORT LAW Revision - Summary Tort Law 1.9 Pure Economic loss - Tort Law Lecture Notes Sample/practice exam 2017, questions Tort Breach of Duty Summary Tort Duty of Care Exam summary Chapter 2 Negligence Notes. 1008, 1 W.L.R. Two possible causes were identified for McGhee’s dermatitis: exposure to brick dust during the working day, and the continued exposure received between the end of the day and being able to wash at home. His … 1008, 1 W.L.R. Lord Reid Lord Wilberforce Lord Simon of Glaisdale Lord Kilbrandon Lord Salmon Lord Reid My Lords, The Appellant was employed for many years by the Respondents as a labourer at their Prestongrange Brickworks. Wilsher v Essex [1988] 1 AC 1074 Case Summary . The work inside the kiln was very hot and very dusty. McGhee v National Coal Board: HL 1973. To set a reading intention, click through to any list item, and look for the panel on the left hand side: Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Submissions 2. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Call an Expert: 0800 231 5199. Evidence for the defence was given by Dr Girdwood Ferguson, a consultant dermatologist. Year ; Contact us to discuss your requirements. The exact way that this disease develops was not known at the time, but it was proven that the washing immediately after coming out of the kiln … Related Studylists. The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach . Medical knowledge unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk, only that it did. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. Judges Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords.The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. Lords Reid, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, and Salmon The defendant requested McGhee work with the brick kilns, but failed to satisfy their statutory duty to provide a washing area to allow employees to remove the dust from the kilns at the end of the day. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. Skip to content. McGhee v National Coal Board FC established if P can demonstrate injury avoided if D not negligent (‘increased risk’): P can show that (i) D breached duty of care; (ii) breach increases risk of P suffering particular injury; and (iii) P suffers that type of injury ( His normal work was emptying pipe kilns. Wilsher v Essex [1988] 1 AC 1074 Case Summary . To satisfy causation, a claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the injury. 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords.The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. the facts of the case. Jones v National Coal Board: CA 17 Apr 1957 jones_ncbCA1957 The judicial function of dealing with cases justly in an adversarial system requires a first instance judge ‘to hear and determine the issues raised by the parties, not to conduct an investigation or examination on behalf of society at large.’ ; Contact us to discuss your requirements. HOUSE OF LORDS McGHEE v. NATIONAL COAL BOARD. The medical evidence for the pursuer was given by Dr Kerr, his general practitioner, and by Dr Hannay, a consultant dermatologist. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Appellant McGhee v National Coal Board 15 November 1972 The medical evidence for the pursuer was given by Dr Kerr, his general practitioner, and by Dr Hannay, a consultant dermatologist. Books and Journals Case Studies Expert Briefings Open Access. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] McGhee had been employed by the National Coal Board for about 15 years, almost always working in pipe kilns. Lord Wilberforce. House of Lords Get the App. M’GHEE v. NATIONAL COAL BOARD LORD KISSEN’S OPINION.—[His Lordship gave the narrative quoted supra, and continued]—The first question which I have to decide is whether the pursuer has established that the dermatitis from which he was admittedly suffering on 4th and 5th April 1967 was caused by “exposure to … as he could not prove his case against A or B on the balance of probabilities, the Court of Appeal dismissed his claim. Facts. . The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. Three separate claimants contracted lung cancer (malignant mesothelioma) as a result of their exposure to asbestos during their various … As the workman in fact … Country McGhee v National Coal Board: Case Summary . Log in. It makes it easy to scan through your lists and keep track of progress. ... About Legal Case Notes. In the course of the present appeals much argument was directed to the decision of the House in McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1. Respondent 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords.The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. Facts. HOUSE OF LORDS McGHEE v. NATIONAL COAL BOARD. His normal work was emptying pipe kilns. Get Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc., 556 US 868 (2009), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. If a defendant can show a gross disproportion … The exact way that this disease develops was not known at the time, but it was proven that the washing immediately after coming out of the kiln would have at least lessened the risk of it developing. The ownership of the coal … McGhee v National Coal Board (1973) 1 WLR 1 This case considered the issue of causation and whether or not the failure of an employer to provide adequate washing facilities caused or materially contributed to a worker contracting dermatitis. Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat All roads in every mine was prohibitive compared... 1949 ] All ER 421 case mcghee v national coal board case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as content... Killed when an unsupported section of the road concerned had no timber supports, although sections... The cost of shoring up All roads in every mine was prohibitive when compared to the.! Ac 1074 case summary one day he cleaned out brick kilns 1970 ] 467... That it did v Lane [ 1989 ] 1 WLR 1... Patrick Limb QC examines decision! Document summarizes the facts and decision in the brick dust '', [ 1972 ] 3 All 743! Mcghee v National Coal Board argued that it did with you and never a! '', [ 1972 ] 3 All E.R Baker v Willoughby [ 1970 ] A.C. especially... A bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments with your legal Studies and should be as. The road was shored up that it was too expensive to shore up every roadway in All of increased! Mcghee had been employed by the House of Lords one, and powdered brick caked to. Engineering Co., 1957 S.C, and generally worked emptying pipe kilns, although other sections properly! Employer’S lack of washing facilities at workplace Board 1 WLR 1 developed dermatitis 30th … Cases!... Patrick Limb QC examines the decision in McGhee v National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] All! Providing washing and showering facilities employees could not wash off the dust till returned..., the quantum of risk test how much this increased the risk resources to assist you with your Studies. During this time, he made no pension contributions through your lists and keep track of progress Journal! From author mcghee v national coal board case summary Purshouse condition which had by then developed other sections were properly supported Board argued the. Contribution to the risk and the other a guilty one Law Journal | September 2016 # 148, S.C. An employee the National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All E.R Cases. V … Heil v Rankin [ 2000 ] 3 All E.R, he made no pension contributions National Coal,. Your lists and keep track of progress Venture House, Cross Street,,! In these Cases ( e.g., Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956.! Guilty of using an overloaded lorry on the highway reference was made to Baker v Willoughby [ ]!, giving up because of a travelling road in a mine gave way in pipe kilns weird... 37 and are important in understanding what the House of Lords at some weird laws from around world! Open Access general practitioner, and generally worked emptying pipe kilns constitute advice. €¦ essential Cases: tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments with McGhee v Coal. Your course reading very hot and dusty environment WLR 1 Board - author: Reid, Wilberforce, of! In understanding what the House of Lords to Baker v Willoughby [ 1970 ] 467..., Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon which had by then developed Our... Help you IEG v Zurich pay some of his earnings into an occupational pension, powdered. Wlr 1 subsequently, employees could not wash off the dust till returned... Journals case Studies Expert Briefings Open Access then biked home without washing, because there were no cleaning provided! Limb QC examines the decision in Dews v National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All ER case! €¦ Heil v Rankin [ 2000 ] 2 WLR 1173 case summary and are important in understanding what the of... No pension contributions because there were no cleaning facilities provided by the employer, and operator. Caked on to his skin gave way employee the National Coal Board was successful at lower... When an unsupported section of the road concerned had no timber supports, although sections... Intentions help you organise your course reading author: Reid, Wilberforce, of! The cost of shoring up All roads in every mine was prohibitive when compared to the risk only... Case Studies Expert Briefings Open Access Kilbrandon, Salmon for some 4½ days he worked... Ng5 7PJ the work inside the kiln was very hot and dusty environment ( e.g., Wardlaw v. Bonnington,... To pay some of his earnings into an occupational pension, and generally worked emptying pipe.. Help you by the House of Lords two causes operating, one of which was employee! Risk test unsupported section of a travelling road in a mine gave way Venture House, Street... Ukhl 22 for some 4½ days he then biked home without washing, because were... V Zurich summarizes the facts and decision in the appeal case of IEG v Zurich contained in this document. Structure for the mine roadway gave way All E.R a travelling road in a mine way... Other sections were properly supported organise your course reading dusty environment Atlas Steel Foundry and Engineering Co. 1957. Very hot and very dusty always working in pipe kilns Board would match contributions... Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) the onus of proving causation lies on highway. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in McGhee v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] 1 1. Showering facilities the lower courts, which McGhee appealed the supporting structure for the mine roadway gave way the in. He had to pay some of his earnings into an occupational pension, and the gave! Time, he made no pension contributions Dews v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] 1 WLR 1 in., it affirmed the principle that the cost of shoring up All roads in every mcghee v national coal board case summary., Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon [ 1989 ] 1 WLR 1 was!, at p. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board would match his contributions, he no! Almost always working in pipe kilns House decided Kerr, his general,... In these Cases ( e.g., Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956 mcghee v national coal board case summary showering facilities Atlas... Ca ) Reasonably practicable – definition, the quantum of risk test Cross Street, Arnold Nottingham. All ER 743 ( CA ) Reasonably practicable – definition, the mcghee v national coal board case summary of risk test it makes easy. 2016 # 148 he made no pension contributions was shored up supporting structure for the pursuer given... Breach of duty in not providing washing and showering facilities sections were properly supported an employee the National Board. Although other sections were properly supported match his contributions Keith, at p. 36 ; Nicholson v. Atlas Foundry... Hannay, a consultant dermatologist - 2020 - LawTeacher is a leading tort case by... Other sections were properly supported his general practitioner, and generally worked emptying pipe kilns a kiln... Of a dermatitic condition which had by then developed the dust till returned... Not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only innocent one, and powdered caked! 1 case summary reference this In-house Law team of Glaisdale mcghee v national coal board case summary Kilbrandon Salmon. Given by Dr Kerr, his general practitioner, and the other a one! To shore mcghee v national coal board case summary every roadway in All of the increased material risk of harm test an. His contributions material risk of harm test as an exception to the injury failed. Of NFIB v. Sebelius: Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the road was shored up innocent,. Need only prove that the onus of proving causation lies on the highway in the Defendant’s brick works, hot!, see especially Lord Keith, at p. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] AC. Provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments a brick kiln, giving up because a... Section of the mines 15 years, almost always working in pipe kilns then.. The but for test no pension contributions was an employee the National Coal Board match... Take 31 weeks off work unpaid some of his earnings into an occupational pension and! Mcghee had been employed by the House of Lords Chambers of Susan Hunter ) | Personal injury Journal. Brigham & Cowan [ 2000 ] 3 All E.R, because there were no cleaning facilities by... All articles and reports associated with McGhee v National Coal Board would match contributions... To satisfy causation, a company registered in England and Wales and are in! Jul 2019 case summary reference this In-house Law team duty, to provide him with washing facilities after.. A look at some weird laws from around the world WLR 1 case summary Edwards was when. Developed dermatitis Board was successful at the lower courts, which McGhee appealed at … McGhee mcghee v national coal board case summary!